ALL-SEEING EYE / COMPARE INFORMATION

Conflicting information?
See what supports each answer.

Bring together the observations you have, compare the possible answers, and see what still needs checking. Start with a simple community example. You do not need to understand the engine to try it.

TRY IT HERE FREE LOCAL RUNEXAMPLE FICTIONAL COMMUNITY EVENTPUBLIC ACCESS NOT AVAILABLE YET
Try the example belowWhat can it tell me?
01 / TRY IT, THEN USE YOUR OWN OBSERVATIONS

What are you trying to check?

Useful for comparing conflicting notices or organising evidence for a small research question. You supply the possible answers and observations; the tool shows how their support compares.

01 / SUPPLY EVIDENCE02 / GROUP SIGNALS03 / COMPUTE SUPPORT04 / INSPECT + VERIFY
START HERE / ABOUT TWO MINUTES

Two dates. Which one has more support?

A flyer says Saturday. A newsletter agrees. A community post says Sunday. Try this fictional swap-day example to see the conflicting information side by side.

01 / WHAT YOU FOUND

Three conflicting notices

FlyerSaturdayYour confidence: 0.6
NewsletterSaturdayYour confidence: 0.5
Group postSundayYour confidence: 0.7
02 / WORKED EXAMPLE

Compare their support

Expected scores for these sample inputs:

Illustration of the calculation, not a live result. Run the example to get a fresh result from the engine.

03 / WHAT TO DO NEXT

Check the original notice

Saturday has more supplied support, but the newsletter may repeat the flyer. Ask the organiser which date is current.

Try changing it: remove the newsletter and run again. Sunday now leads.

Both options replace the entries below with fictional sample observations. Run this example now also sends them to the local engine. No payment is taken.

For your own comparison, add what you found and which possible answer it supports. This tool groups matching answers and compares their support. It does not search the web or answer your question from its wording.

Experimental analysis based on the inputs and assumptions shown. Results may be incomplete or wrong and do not guarantee future events. Not medical, legal or financial advice. No action is taken on your behalf.

Your observations

Use the exact same answer text for observations supporting the same answer: for example, Saturday. Confidence is your own judgement: 0 means no confidence, 0.5 means mixed or uncertain, and 1 means full confidence. These numbers are not verified probabilities. Two sources may repeat the same original information.

Observation 1
No payment is taken for this local run.

02 / COST AND AVAILABILITY

Free to try on this computer.

No payment is taken for the local comparison above. The planned public price is A$4 per completed read, with no subscription. Public access and paid reads are not available yet.

LIVE NOWLocal evidence analysisThe bounded v0.3 engine is implemented and checked on every local run. The Compare evidence button above calculates a result from the observations you supply.
COMMERCIAL TARGETA$4.00 / completed public readOne-off price, not a subscription. Public paid delivery is intentionally disabled until secure payment verification, one-read fulfilment and a deployment-safe analysis service are connected.

No payment is taken by this page today. The missing piece is commerce and public delivery infrastructure — not a substitute or pretend analysis result.

03 / UNDERSTAND THE RESULT

A clearer comparison. Still your judgement.

A result shows how the information you supplied supports each answer. It does not confirm that the observations are true. A high score is not a probability, a prediction, or proof.

The tool does not fetch websites, read images or interpret your question. Source names and confidence values are supplied by you. You can inspect the observations behind each score and export the result.

Experimental analysis only. Results may be incomplete or wrong. Not medical, legal or financial advice. No action is taken on your behalf.

Inspect the method and project evidence